The Australian controversial move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.
The European Momentum
Across Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.
- Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy may be formalized next year.
- Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
- Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options on the table".
- In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a proposal raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
- In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
- The administration in The Netherlands has recommended parents to block their youngsters from social media before 15.
Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.
"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," said the European lawmaker driving the initiative.
The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach
For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".
Last year, momentum built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.
Charities have expressed concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people reach the legal age.
"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design tools that are safe and suitable for young users," said a prominent online safety campaigner.
America: A Decentralized Picture
In the United States, action is largely occurring at the state level due to federal stalemate.
- Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
- Florida has signed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
- The state of Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
- Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws demanding parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.
Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.
Global Outlook
Beyond the West, further countries are likewise taking action.
- The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
- The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.
But, global agencies adopt a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve safety.
Even as this global debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and several other countries show that states around the world are less and less prepared to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.